Skip to content
ARION
Why Arion

How Arion compares to other competitor tools

A side-by-side look at data capture, review workflows and analytics across the leading EDC platforms — and where a single-database architecture changes the operational story.

Request a demo
The comparison

Where a single-database architecture changes the operational story

Comparison points reflect common patterns across competitor tools and public product documentation checked in August 2026. Not exhaustive — every platform is broader than one table can capture.

DimensionArionOther competitor tools
Capture & analysisOne database — nothing to export to analyseOften exports to a separate analytics layer or module
Study buildAI-assisted protocol & spreadsheet extractionConfiguration options vary; some require specialist build support
Data quality workflowSaves are never blocked; findings become queriesConfigurable edit checks; behavior varies by implementation
Mid-study change controlStructural edits show the exact patient-data impact before you confirmProtocol amendments are supported; impact visibility varies
Source data verificationEvent, page and field levels, with inheritanceTargeted or configurable SDV, depending on the platform
Role-based access13 roles, org- and center-scoped out of the boxConfigurable roles; scope and defaults vary
eCOA / remote captureBuilt in — access-code protected mobile formsOften a separate eCOA or ePRO module

Sources: public product documentation and market materials, current as of August 2026.

How it works

Publishing to production is one-way; amendments are versioned

Arion keeps testing and production explicitly separate, so nobody can accidentally publish disposable test data as a live study. Once live, the design changes through a reviewed amendment draft that publishes a new version and preserves collected data. The new version applies to new subjects and visits not yet started; existing visits retain their collection version until explicitly migrated.

Study status moves forward. The production design keeps evolving through explicit versions.

No rollback to testing, but production studies can evolve through controlled, auditable amendments.

Study lifecycle: draft to testing to productionDraft publishes forward into Testing, which publishes forward into Production with a typed confirmation. Production cannot be rolled back to Testing: it permanently clears disposable testing data and locks the live design. Authorized builders can still start an amendment, edit a private draft, review its impact, and publish a new version without deleting collected data.no rollback · amend via new versionPublish for TestingPublish to Productiontyped confirmation requiredDraftprotocol fully editableTestingdisposable test patients & dataProductiondesign lockedpatient workflows live
A controlled amendment, end to end

Change the live design without losing what happened before

  1. 01

    Publish deliberately

    A typed confirmation moves the tested study into production and clears disposable test data.

  2. 02

    Work in a private draft

    Authorized builders start an amendment while sites continue working with the published version.

  3. 03

    Review the real impact

    Arion separates structural and cosmetic changes and shows affected patient data before publication.

  4. 04

    Publish without erasing history

    The new version applies prospectively. Earlier collected values stay preserved and attributable.

Production is protected
Production is protected
Private amendment draft
Private amendment draft
Impact reviewed before publish
Impact reviewed before publish
Earlier-version values preserved
Earlier-version values preserved

Actual Arion production and amendment workflow

Questions

What people ask before switching

What is the difference between an EDC and a CDMS?

EDC (Electronic Data Capture) usually refers to the data-entry layer — the eCRF. A CDMS (Clinical Data Management System) adds review workflows like queries and SDV on top. Arion is both: capture, review and analytics in one platform, so the distinction stops mattering operationally.

Is Arion an alternative to other competitor tools?

For sponsors and CROs who want study design, capture, review and analytics in one system rather than a multi-tool workflow, yes. Arion is a focused, single-database alternative rather than a like-for-like feature match with every broader competitor platform.

How long does it take to launch a study?

AI-assisted protocol and spreadsheet extraction gets a first draft of the study structure in minutes rather than weeks, but the real timeline depends on protocol complexity and how much review your team wants before publishing to production.

Does Arion support decentralised or remote data collection?

Yes — the eCOA module delivers access-code protected, signed-token public forms over SMS invitation, so patients can complete assessments on their own device without a separate ePRO system.

Is Arion GDPR compliant?

Arion acts as a data processor under GDPR, with a Data Processing Agreement accepted at organization creation. See the Security page for the specific mechanisms — audit trail, access control, and hosting.

Can Arion run alongside our existing CTMS or eTMF?

Arion is focused on eCRD/EDC — study design, data capture, review and analytics. It doesn't replace a CTMS or eTMF, and integration with those systems is evaluated case by case rather than shipped as a packaged connector today.

See it on your protocol

Bring a protocol or an existing study and we'll show you what this looks like in Arion.

Request a demo